College / School
College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences
Department
Social Work
Program / Major / Certificate
Bachelor of Social Work/ Social Work
Assessment Coordinator(s)
Felicia Tuggle, PhD
Has there been a change to the Assessment Coordinator(s) since the last
assessment plan?
No
Person(s) responsible for writing and/or submitting this report:
Roenia DeLoach and Linda Samuel
The Department of Social Work prepares students to excel in social work
practice. The Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) programs prepares students for
generalist practice and the Master of Social Works (MSW) program builds on the
generalist foundation and prepares students for advanced practice in Clinical
and Social Administration. The Department promotes student focused learning,
affirms the African American legacy and fosters a unique multicultural
environment through its BSW and MSW curriculum and advocacy roles in community
change. The department graduates students who are culturally competent to
practice social work in rural, urban and global settings.
Has this mission statement been revised since the last plan?
No
1. The students will be able to demonstrate ethical and professional behavior.
2. The students will be able to engage diversity and difference in practice.
3. The students will be able to advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice.
4. The students will be able to engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice.
5. The students will be able to engage in policy practice.
6. The students will be able to engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
7. The students will be able to assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
8. The students will be able to intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
9. The students will be able to evaluate practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
LINK TO: Assessment Report, 2015-2016 – Supporting Documents
SSU Strategic Plan Goal |
PSLO |
Semester |
Professor |
Courses |
Assessment Artifacts and Instruments |
Target Levels |
Results and Analysis of Results |
Actions in Response to Results |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
1. The students will be able to demonstrate ethical and professional behavior. |
Fall 2015 |
R. DeLoach |
SOWK 3101 Research Methods |
Miss Ever’s Boys assignment - PSLO #1 Rubric |
80% of the student will score at 80%or higher |
TARGET MET A total of 35 students were enrolled in the Research Methods course. 94% of the students scored at level 3 or higher.
There were some indications of student not having a clear understanding of other unethical professional research practice that was not covered in the film or this assignment. This was observed when they began to develop and implement their own research project. |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
2. The students will be able to engage diversity and difference in practice. |
Spring 2016 |
L. Samuel |
SOWK 3340 Interventive Methods I |
Diverse Population Presentation - PSLO #2 Rubric |
80% of the students will score 80% or higher |
TARGET MET A total of 27 BSW students were enrolled in the course. 100% of the students scored 80% or higher on the Diverse Population Presentation.
Students demonstrated an understanding of how diversity and difference characterized and shape the human experience. |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
3. The students will be able to advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice. |
Spring 2016 |
L. Samuel |
SOWK 2200 Human Needs and Human Services |
Social Issue Presentation - PSLO #3 Rubric |
80% of the students will score 80% or higher |
TARGET MET A total of 35 BSW students were enrolled in the SOWK 2200. 90% of the students in the course scored above 80%.
The results show evidence that the students were able to apply their understanding of social, economic and environmental justice to advocate for human rights at the individual and system levels. |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
4. The students will be able to engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice. |
Fall 2015 |
R. DeLoach |
SOWK 3101 Research Methods |
Research Paper - PSLO #4 Rubric |
80% of the student will score at 80% or higher |
TARGET NOT MET A total of 35 students were enrolled in the research methods course. 80% of the students scored at 80% on the research paper.
This is the first time in three year assessment period that this target has been met. |
OVERALL: TARGET NOT MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
5. The students will be able to engage in policy practice. |
Fall 2015 |
R. DeLoach |
SOWK 2205 History of Social Welfare and Social Policy |
Policy Advocacy Presentation - PSLO #5 Rubric |
80% of the student will score at 80% or higher |
TARGET MET A total of 31 students were enrolled in the History of Social Welfare and Social Policy course. 100% of the students scored at 80% or higher. |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
6. The students will be able to engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Fall 2015 |
L Samuel |
SOWK 3341 Interventive Method II |
Group Practice Session Assessment - PSLO #6 Rubric |
80% of the students will score 80% or higher |
TARGET MET 17 BSW students’ individual practice session assessment assignment was scored using ten items scale with a total of 100 points. 100% of the students in the course scored above 80%.
The results show evidence that the students understand that engagement is an ongoing component of the interactive process of social work practice. |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
7. The students will be able to assess individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Spring 2016 |
L Samuel |
SOWK 3340 Interventive Method I |
Individual Practice Session Assessment - PSLO #7 Rubric |
80% of the students will score 80% or higher |
TARGET MET 27 BSW students’ individual practice session assessment assignment was scored using ten items scale with a total of 100 points. 100% of the students in the course scored above 80%.
The results show evidence that the students understand that assessment is an ongoing component of the interactive process of social work practice. |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
8. The students will be able to intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Fall 2015 |
L Samuel |
SOWK 3341 Interventive Method II |
Group Practice Session Assessment - PSLO #8 Rubric |
80% of the students will score 80% or higher |
TARGET MET 17 BSW students’ individual practice session assessment assignment was scored using ten items scale with a total of 100 points. 100% of the students in the course scored above 80% which means that the benchmark was met.
The results show evidence that the students understand that assessment is an ongoing component of the interactive process of social work practice. |
OVERALL:
TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
9. The students will be able to evaluate practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. |
Spring 2016 |
R. DeLoach |
SOWK 3342 Interventive Method III |
Macro Community Project - PSLO #9 Rubric |
80% of the students will score 80% or higher |
TARGET MET A total of 37 students were enrolled in the Interventive Method III course. 100% of the students scored at or higher than 80%
This is a macro level project that is student driven. The must develop a program or conduct a research project for a defined community or a community based agency. Students tend to do very well with this project. |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
SSU Strategic Plan Goal |
PO Goal |
Enabling Strategies |
Measures |
Targets |
Results and Analysis of Results |
Actions in Response to Results |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
Increase the number of BSW students enrolled in graduate school 2-year post BSW degree |
a. Increase discussion of graduate school b. Transport students to other university visitations c. Invite graduate social work program recruiters to campus d. Invite alums to speak with students |
List of students accepted and attending a graduate programs |
At least 25% of the cohort will attend graduate school |
TARGET MET A total of 14/23 (61%) students were accepted into graduate programs to begin either Summer 2016 (7) or Fall 2016 (7) one-year post BSW degree. However, one student did not enter the advanced Standing MSW program due to financial difficulties. Overall, thirteen students entered a Master of Social Work Graduate Program and one student entered a Masters/PhD Divinity program |
OVERALL: TARGET MET Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2016-2017 academic year: No action needed. The program will continue with current strategies. |
Increase funding opportunities to provide stipends, travel, tuition awards for students via grants or other funding sources |
Develop grant writing team |
List of grants awarded for each year |
≥ 2 per year
|
TARGET EXCEEDED The department has a total of 6 grants for this academic year 1) Title IV-E Child welfare Grant (renew yearly) 2) SAMHSA HIV/AIDS, Substance Abuse and Hepatitis C (2015-2018) 3) HRSA- Behavioral Health Specialization Program (2014-2017) 4) President Mini Grant-Saturday School (annual application) 5) CMP- Quality Care and Improvement (QCPI) Program (applied not awarded) 6) Gilman Student International Travel (2 students funded) |
OVERALL: TARGET MET Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2016-2017 academic year: The program will continue to identify sources of funding to assure that we have a minimum of 2 grants per academic year. Once a grant cycle is over, we would have identified a replacement grant if we will have fewer than two grants. |
|
First year retention of BSW students. |
Restructure the BSW curriculum to offer social work courses each semester beginning with the incoming freshman cohort |
Banner data |
≥ 50% retention rate |
TARGET MET Fall 2014 to Fall 2015 retention rate = 54% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2016-2017 academic year: Although we were able to meet the target, there were more students admitted as social work majors who were not able to register for the course. We decided to offer two sections with plans to add an additional section if needed. Also, the course was closed to non-social work majors; the advising unit and the Social Work Department were the two units allowed to register social work students and identified non-declared majors into the course Fall 2016. |